18. Linked lists¶
18.1. Embedded references¶
We have seen examples of attributes that refer to other objects, which we called embedded references. A common data structure, the linked list, takes advantage of this feature.
Linked lists are made up of nodes, where each node contains a reference to the next node in the list. In addition, each node contains a unit of data called the cargo.
A linked list is considered a recursive data structure because it has a recursive definition.
A linked list is either:
the empty list, represented by
None
, ora node that contains a cargo object and a reference to a linked list.
Recursive data structures lend themselves to recursive methods.
18.2. The Node
class¶
As usual when writing a new class, we’ll start with the initialization and
__str__
methods so that we can test the basic mechanism of creating and
displaying the new type:
class Node(object):
def __init__(self, cargo=None, next=None):
self.cargo = cargo
self.next = next
def __str__(self):
return str(self.cargo)
As usual, the parameters for the initialization method are optional. By
default, both the cargo and the link, next
, are set to None
.
The string representation of a node is just the string representation of the
cargo. Since any value can be passed to the str
function, we can store any
value in a list.
We could also write getters and setters for the cargo
and next
instance variables:
class Node(object):
...
...
def getCargo(self):
return self.cargo
def getNext(self):
return self.next
def setCargo(self,c):
self.cargo = c
def setNext(self,n):
self.next = n
To test the implementation so far, we can create a Node
and print it:
>>> node = Node("test")
>>> print(node)
test
>>> print(node.getNext())
None
To make it interesting, we need create more than one node, and link them together:
>>> node1 = Node(1)
>>> node2 = Node(2)
>>> node3 = Node(3)
This code creates three nodes, but we don’t have a linked-list yet because the nodes are not linked. The state diagram looks like this:
To link the nodes, we have to make the first node refer to the second and the second node refer to the third:
>>> node1.setNext(node2)
>>> node2.setNext(node3)
The reference of the third node is None
, which indicates that it is the end
of the list. Now the state diagram looks like this:
Now you know how to create nodes and link them together. What might be less clear at this point is why.
18.3. Lists as collections¶
Lists are useful because they provide a way to assemble multiple objects into a single entity, sometimes called a collection. In the example, the first node of the list serves as a reference to the entire list.
To pass the list as a parameter, we only have to pass a reference to the first
node. For example, the function print_list
takes a single node as an
argument (curr
, short for current). Assuming that is the head of the list,
is accumulates the cargo from each node, printing out the contents of the list at the end:
def print_list(curr):
output = ""
while curr:
output += str(curr) + " "
curr = curr.getNext()
print(output)
To invoke this method, we pass a reference to the first node:
>>> print_list(node1)
1 2 3
Inside print_list
we have a reference to the first node of the list, but
there is no variable that refers to the other nodes. We have to use the
next
value from each node to get to the next node.
To traverse a linked list, it is common to use a loop variable like curr
to
refer to each of the nodes in succession.
This diagram shows the full list and the values that curr
takes on:
18.4. Lists and recursion¶
It is natural to express many list operations using recursive methods. For example, the following is a recursive algorithm for printing a list backwards:
Separate the list into two pieces: the first node (called the head); and the rest (called the tail).
Print the tail backward.
Print the head.
Of course, Step 2, the recursive call, assumes that we have a way of printing a list backward. But if we assume that the recursive call works – the leap of faith – then we can convince ourselves that this algorithm works.
All we need are a base case and a way of proving that for any list, we will
eventually get to the base case. Given the recursive definition of a list, a
natural base case is the empty list, represented by None
.
def print_backward_helper(curr):
if curr == None:
return ""
else:
head = curr
tail = curr.getNext()
return print_backward_helper(tail) + str(head) + " "
def print_backward(firstnode):
output = print_backward_helper(firstnode)
print(output)
In the above example, we use a helper function, so we can just call
print_backward(node1)
the same as we called print_list(node1)
.
The helper function does the actual recursion and accumulating of the string.
The first line of the helper function handles the base case by
returning an empty string (and not recurring). The else case (if we are not at the end of the list)
splits the list into head
and tail
. The final return line adds the head
cargo and a space to the reversed rest of the list.
We invoke this method as we invoked print_list
:
>>> print_backward(node1)
3 2 1
The result is the list contents printed in reverse.
You might wonder why print_list
and print_backward
are functions and not
methods in the Node
class. The reason is that we want to use None
to
represent the empty list and it is not legal to invoke a method on None
.
This limitation makes it awkward to write list-manipulating code in a clean
object-oriented style.
Can we prove that print_backward
will always terminate? In other words,
will it always reach the base case? In fact, the answer is no. Some lists will
make this method crash.
18.5. Infinite lists¶
There is nothing to prevent a node from referring back to an earlier node in the list, including itself. For example, this figure shows a list with two nodes, one of which refers to itself:
If we invoke print_list
on this list, it will loop forever. If we invoke
print_backward
, it will recurse infinitely. This sort of behavior makes
infinite lists difficult to work with.
Nevertheless, they are occasionally useful. For example, we might represent a number as a list of digits and use an infinite list to represent a repeating fraction.
Regardless, it is problematic that we cannot prove that print_list
and
print_backward
terminate. The best we can do is the hypothetical statement,
If the list contains no loops, then these methods will terminate. This sort of
claim is called a precondition. It imposes a constraint on one of the
parameters and describes the behavior of the method if the constraint is
satisfied. You will see more examples soon.
18.6. The fundamental ambiguity theorem¶
One part of print_backward
might have raised an eyebrow:
head = curr
tail = curr.getNext()
After the first assignment, head
and curr
have the same type and the
same value. So why did we create a new variable?
The reason is that the two variables play different roles. We think of head
as a reference to a single node, and we think of curr
as a reference to the
first node of a list. These roles are not part of the program; they are in the
mind of the programmer.
In general we can’t tell by looking at a program what role a variable plays.
This ambiguity can be useful, but it can also make programs difficult to read.
We often use variable names like node
and curr
to document how we
intend to use a variable and sometimes create additional variables to
disambiguate.
We could have written print_backward_helper
without head
and tail
, which
makes it more concise but possibly less clear:
def print_backward_helper(curr):
if curr == None: return ""
return print_backward_helper(curr.getNext()) + str(curr) + " "
The fundamental ambiguity theorem describes the ambiguity that is inherent in a reference to a node: A variable that refers to a node might treat the node as a single object or as the first in a list of nodes.
18.7. Modifying lists¶
There are two ways to modify a linked list. Obviously, we can change the cargo of one of the nodes, but the more interesting operations are the ones that add, remove, or reorder the nodes.
As an example, let’s write a method that removes the second node in the list and returns a reference to the removed node:
def removeSecond(lst):
if lst == None: return
first = lst
second = lst.getNext()
# make the first node refer to the third
first.setNext(second.getNext())
# separate the second node from the rest of the list
second.setNext(None)
return second
Again, we are using temporary variables to make the code more readable. Here is how to use this method:
>>> print_list(node1)
1 2 3
>>> removed = removeSecond(node1)
>>> print_list(removed)
2
>>> print_list(node1)
1 3
This state diagram shows the effect of the operation:
What happens if you invoke this method and pass a list with only one element (a singleton)? What happens if you pass the empty list as an argument? Is there a precondition for this method? If so, fix the method to handle a violation of the precondition in a reasonable way.
18.8. Wrappers and helpers¶
It is often useful to divide a list operation into two methods, as we did above
with the helper function. As an addition to that example,
printing a list backward in the conventional list format [3, 2, 1]
we can simply
add code to the print_backward
method:
def print_backward(firstnode):
output = print_backward_helper(firstnode)
lstbkwd = "[" + output[:len(output)-2] + "]"
print(lstbkwd)
Again, it is a good idea to check methods like this to see if they work with special cases like an empty list or a singleton.
When we use this method,
print_backward
acts as a wrapper, and it
uses print_backward_helper
as a helper.
18.9. The LinkedList
class¶
There are some subtle problems with the way we have been implementing lists. In a reversal of cause and effect, we’ll propose an alternative implementation first and then explain what problems it solves.
First, we’ll create a new class called LinkedList
. Its attributes are an
integer that contains the length of the list and a reference to the first node.
LinkedList
objects serve as handles for manipulating lists of Node
objects:
class LinkedList(object):
def __init__(self):
self.length = 0
self.head = None
One nice thing about the LinkedList
class is that it provides a natural
place to put wrapper functions like print_backward
, which we can
make a method of the LinkedList
class:
class LinkedList(object):
...
def print_backward_helper(self,curr):
if curr == None:
return ""
else:
head = curr
tail = curr.getNext()
return self.print_backward_helper(tail) + str(head) + ", "
def print_backward(self):
output = self.print_backward_helper(self.head)
lstbkwd = "[" + output[:len(output)-2] + "]"
print(lstbkwd)
Another benefit of the LinkedList
class is that it makes it easier to add
or remove the first element of a list. For example, addFirst
is a method
for LinkedList
s; it takes an item of cargo as an argument and puts it at
the beginning of the list:
class LinkedList(object):
...
def addFirst(self, cargo):
node = Node(cargo)
node.setNext(self.head)
self.head = node
self.length = self.length + 1
As usual, you should check code like this to see if it handles the special cases. For example, what happens if the list is initially empty?
18.10. Invariants¶
Some lists are well formed ; others are not. For example, if a list contains a
loop, it will cause many of our methods to crash, so we might want to require
that lists contain no loops. Another requirement is that the length
value
in the LinkedList
object should be equal to the actual number of nodes in
the list.
Requirements like these are called invariants because, ideally, they should be true of every object all the time. Specifying invariants for objects is a useful programming practice because it makes it easier to prove the correctness of code, check the integrity of data structures, and detect errors.
One thing that is sometimes confusing about invariants is that there are times
when they are violated. For example, in the middle of addFirst
, after we
have added the node but before we have incremented length
, the invariant is
violated. This kind of violation is acceptable; in fact, it is often impossible
to modify an object without violating an invariant for at least a little while.
Normally, we require that every method that violates an invariant must restore
the invariant.
If there is any significant stretch of code in which the invariant is violated, it is important for the comments to make that clear, so that no operations are performed that depend on the invariant.
18.11. Glossary¶
- embedded reference
A reference stored in an attribute of an object.
- linked list
A data structure that implements a collection using a sequence of linked nodes.
- node
An element of a list, usually implemented as an object that contains a reference to another object of the same type.
- cargo
An item of data contained in a node.
- link
An embedded reference used to link one object to another.
- precondition
An assertion that must be true in order for a method to work correctly.
- fundamental ambiguity theorem
A reference to a list node can be treated as a single object or as the first in a list of nodes.
- singleton
A linked list with a single node.
- wrapper
A method that acts as a middleman between a caller and a helper method, often making the method easier or less error-prone to invoke.
- helper
A method that is not invoked directly by a caller but is used by another method to perform part of an operation.
- invariant
An assertion that should be true of an object at all times (except perhaps while the object is being modified).
18.12. Exercises¶
By convention, lists are often printed in brackets with commas between the elements, as in
[1, 2, 3]
. Modifyprint_list
so that it generates output in this format.